Our publishing standards
Editorial policy
We aim to make cooking information clear, useful and traceable. The same standards apply to our tools, explanations and articles.
Sources in context
References should support the food, country and preparation being described, rather than just a similar topic.
Examples that agree
An article's example should agree with the supporting tool when the same settings are entered.
Plain, honest language
Useful explanations take priority over impressive claims, invented credentials or guaranteed outcomes.
Written by our team
Our tools and articles are credited to ServingClock team. We use a team byline, without personal profiles or claims of professional qualifications.
We do not claim expert review. Our content is general information and does not replace advice from a qualified professional.
Sources you can follow
Food-safety values come from official guidance for the relevant country. Other reference values come from appropriate government, professional-body or manufacturer publications. Tools link to their sources so you can inspect the underlying guidance.
We label estimates and editable starting values. We do not present a recipe duration or a rule of thumb as an official safety requirement.
Checks before a page goes live
Before publishing, we check the explanation against its sources, compare worked examples with the tool and check the page's main controls. Articles should support an available tool and use the same underlying guidance.
Sources can change after a page is prepared. Follow the current guidance and remember that these pages have not been independently reviewed.
Corrections and updates
If we find an error, we check the affected source, wording and calculation before publishing a correction. We clarify affected explanations and examples alongside the correction.
To help us investigate an issue, include the page address, country, inputs and result, together with an official source if you have one. Leave out personal or sensitive information.
What a useful cooking guide should contain
A guide starts with a direct answer to the question in its title, then gives the context needed to use that answer. Where helpful, it includes a table, a worked schedule, practical preparation steps or common mistakes to look out for.
The guide should explain what the numbers refer to. A ready-to-cook time, oven start and serving time are different points in a meal. Units, country guidance and any assumptions should be clear before a reader applies an example to their own kitchen.
How a guide is prepared
We check the question and its sources before turning the information into a guide. The explanation should connect to an available tool so that a reader can move from an example to the settings that fit their own meal.
A publication date describes when an article becomes available. It does not promise an independent expert review or remove the limits explained on the page.
Establish the task
Identify the question, relevant country and supporting tool.
Trace the information
Check the source, scope, assumptions and example inputs.
Check the page
Review the wording, links, result and usable phone layout.
Connect the guide
Link to the available supporting tool and make the publication date and source notes clear.
Illustrations, examples and authorship
The kitchen illustrations and mascot help explain the website and give it a consistent visual identity. They are decorative or explanatory artwork, not photographs of an author or evidence that a recipe has been tested by the person shown.
An example is included to make an explanation easier to follow. Unless a page explicitly ties a value to a source, do not interpret an illustrative ingredient, pictured dish or sample duration as official food-safety guidance.
Frequently asked questions
Are the tools and articles independently expert reviewed?
No expert review is claimed. The pages use the configured team byline and identify their references and checks. This information is a planning aid, not individual professional advice.
Why does an article link to a tool?
A guide explains the task and its limits. Its supporting tool lets you apply the relevant inputs to your own quantities or schedule. Read both the explanation and the result notes.
How can I point out a mistake?
The Contact page explains what details help with a correction, including the page address, country, inputs and an official reference where available. Use the email published on that page.
